“Timing Is Everything”,
is almost always associated with good tidings, with all the trappings of
serendipity, but seldom to describe a bad outcome.
But then:
“The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.”
― Willie Nelson
There, Old Willie may have stumbled
upon a typical country-and-western philosophy and an intriguing theme for a
debate. Timing did work for the bird but what about the worm that wriggled
itself up early to the surface, or near enough to be detected and plucked? It
too must have had a good reason to be up early. On the other hand, the eager
first mouse to grab the cheese paid the ultimate price so the second one can
benefit; although I read that in actuality no mice will ever come near a mouse
trap with a fellow dead mouse in it, as enticing as the cheese may be (likewise,
a rat trap must be cleaned so thoroughly of the warning scent left by the
previous occupant before it will catch another rat; and re-using a mouse trap
may not work at all as the tale tell scent from the prior victim remains). So, timing may not have worked so well from the
perspective of the early worm but it is always everything to the beneficiary of
the bounty, which is often the story we hear, the mouse version per Old Willie,
notwithstanding.
On the other hand, there is this
to think about:
“Your best work involves timing.
If someone wrote the best hip hop song of all time in the Middle Ages, he had
bad timing.”
― Scott Adams
Of course, there is such a thing as being ahead of the times
and so the rapper in the Year 1317 was not going to make a good living but,
just to be clear, there were minstrels in that era who did well. “Being at the right place at the right time”
made sense then as it does now; and so the corollary to it, “Being at the wrong place at the wrong
time”, and other permutations associated with the two phrases.
So, we’ll accept “good timing” and “bad timing” as two sides
of the circumstantial coin. Hopefully, they do not occur with the regularity of
a 50-50 coin toss and more with an 80-20 split in favor of “good timing”.
Speaking of coin:
“Time is a coin that you can spend only once. Use it, invest it and
make it count”.
--- Anonymous
Speaking of count:
How do we account for something
we cannot see, physically hold, taste, smell, etc.? Such is time but it is not even an entity we can
point to, up close or from a distance, let alone restrain it in a container for
later observation. This takes us to: What
is Time really? A handful of physicists (emphasis
on ‘handful’) and perhaps twice as many philosophers say it is just an
illusion.
Let’s detour that way without pre-judging
it as a silly or crazy idea. Bear with
me because, if anything, it exercises the mind to think or ponder these things
from time to time. The Babylonians started it with their sexagesimal numbering
system, counting in 60s versus our decimal system of 10s. Counting in 10s, 20s,
30s look straightforwardly simple today but there was a method to the
Babylonians’ madness when they came up with 60 seconds to a minute and 60
minutes to an hour. 60 is a good number between 1 and 100 that can be factored nicely,
i.e., 60 can be expressed as: 60X1; 30X2; 20X3; 15X4; 12X5; 10X6. In other words, it has the most number of
factors, namely: 1,2,3,4,5,6,10,12,15,20,30,60. Likewise, 12 and 24 have the
most number of factors than numbers lower than them. For example, 12X1, 6X2, 4X3 has more than
10X1, 5X2. (Try that with 24). Time, the 4th dimension as we are often told,
was subdivided for the convenience of the early, ancient timekeepers. However,
today’s digital watches and clocks negate the advantage of the sexagesimal
method. The decimal point has allowed us
the ability to dissect anything into almost infinitesimal fragments, including
what was conceived as the basic unit of time – the second.
If recorded history is 5,000
years old, thanks to the Sumerians and their Cuneiform writings, the first
humanoids were supposed to have first appeared 1.7 million years ago, while our
direct human ancestors began their evolutionary journey a mere fraction of that
time when they first appeared 2,000 centuries ago. Throughout all that pre-clock
era humans had no concept of a ticking time. In fact, modern time keeping began
only when the first pendulum clock was invented in 1656. Before then, folks got
by just fine. Early on, before clocks and calendars, they simply observed and
made mental notes, passed on from generation to generation, culture to culture,
the changing of the seasons, phases of the moon and the daily routine of waking
up at sunrise and settling down after sunset.
What is more amazing though, if we think about it, is that early
thinkers and observers figured out a calendar of a year composed of 365 days,
more or less, even without first realizing that the earth revolved around the
sun. Galileo got in trouble with the
Church when he posited the idea that the earth was not the center of it all.
The first adjustable mechanical alarm clock was patented in 1847. It
is hard to imagine before then how people managed to wake up in the morning to
go to work. More profoundly, before the
clock, how did folks organize their days, how were things scheduled and how did
schedules get kept. If you toiled for a living, there were no hourly or daily
rates for your work. There were no psychiatrists, obviously, as how could they
have billed their patients or declared the end of a session. We can say that
before the clock time as we know
today did not exist. There was no tick tock to segregate the second-by-second
march of time. A lot of activities we
have and do today did not exist before the clock came about.
Today, we have accepted that time is this oppressively ever present
part of life – it is there at every moment, like an invisible wall pressing
forward whether we are paying attention or not, but it has only this one
direction that is not known to go backwards or sideways. Most of all, this invisible entity, if it is
even an entity because we cannot actually physically feel it, rules our modern
world. Massive amount of money is moved around the globe by traders obsessed
with precision timing, from time zone to time zone as markets open and close,
as fractions of a cent in well-timed executions can make or break a fund’s
daily performance. Mega law firms live by
their billable hours while boutique law offices charge hourly what their
clients can afford. Cynical, perhaps, but the world can be obsessed over Usain
Bolt’s 9.81-second 100-meter dash in Rio (2016), or be awed by Michael Phelps
victory in the 100-meter butterfly 2008 Beijing Olympics over Milorad Cavic,
who came in second by a mere fingertip (literally). Their time was separated by 1/100 of a second.
Had the touch pad technology not been invented, the race could conceivably have
been ruled differently (or declared a tie) if the judges relied on manual stop
watches.
Did we inadvertently invent time
to rule over our activities? Let’s get back to the Olympics for a minute. Let’s
have a thought experiment about extraterrestrials reviewing films of the 1938
and 2016 Olympics. We cannot assume they have some kind of time keeping system,
let alone, similar to ours (it is possible they do not even track time at all) but
they will have no problem recognizing that Jesse Owens won the 100 meter event
in 1938 as did Usain Bolt in 2016. They
will be oblivious to our concept of time but they can discern the idea of the
race and appreciate each respective result. When we come to think about it, time
is not necessary for an event to occur.
It is mainly a recording entry after the fact that an event occurred.
Our concept of time is naturally
local – local to earth, that is. Despite
Isaac Newton’s fervent belief that time is absolute all throughout the
universe, we now know it’s not. Time
does not “run” at the same rate on a satellite; actually, it is not even the
same on a 747 or F-18 Falcon, albeit by mere billionths of a second, relative
to the clock sitting on the ground. Time
“runs” faster at the executive office 85 floors above compared to the basement,
again in billionths of a second; thus, the top-floor-dwelling CEO is aging
faster than the janitor. As weird and incredibly silly as that might seem, it
is factually and scientifically true. Nanoseconds, big deal, we say, but it is
significant enough that clocks on the satellite must be constantly synchronized
hourly with earth based clocks, lest they get out of step quickly, making your
car GPS navigation system worthless within a few hours if not corrected. Put two identical clocks (one on Jupiter, the
other earth-bound) and they will quickly be out of whack with each other, in
relative terms. Jupiter’s clock will run slower relative to the earth clock,
while earth’s clock is observed by Jovian residents to run faster. [Note: Jovian
citizens exist only in my imagination].
I needed to make that detour into
what many might consider the abstract, if not weird, nature of time. It does not clarify or define what
time really is but rather to make us
think a little bit more about this “thing” that permeates every facet of our
lives but which, unlike anything that affects everything around us, including everything
we do, we cannot actually physically touch it or hold on to it or re-direct it,
or give it away.
We’re told too about how time is allotted equally to each and
every person every morning he or she wakes up and any of it unused is gone
forever, then we start all over again the next day – with the same amount disbursed
for everyone. It makes for a gem of an
insight, a most astute even profound observation, as if time is an equal
opportunity provider of fair chances for everyone. It does sound inspirationally motivating, but
is time really all that? I actually subscribed to that in my earlier
musings because it does seem to connote equal opportunity. But then I began asking: (a) Where does time come from, if we were to treat it as
being equally allotted to each and every one of us?; (b) Why can’t one have
more?; (c) Why does time go
incredibly fast when we’re having fun?; (d) How come molasses outruns the “flow of time” when we’re bored with
nothing to do or waiting for someone who is late?
“The only reason for time is so
that everything doesn't happen all at once”.
The above quote had been attributed
to a lot of people, including Albert Einstein and other famous folks, but there
has never been any documented proof.
“The oldest confirmed use of any version of this quote… is from Ray
Cummings' short story ‘The Time Professor’, published in the Jan. 8, 1921 issue
of Argosy All-Story Weekly.
"I do know what time
is," Tubby declared. He paused. "Time," he added slowly --
"time is what keeps everything from happening at once”.
That quote is best said with a little
shrug of the shoulder with both hands raised mid-torso, palms pointing upwards,
which will then prompt any listener to roll his or her eyes. Well, let’s ponder that for a moment.
Is it possible that what we
perceive as the running of time resides only in our brain as it tries to make
sense of the orderly step by step sequences that make up an event or events? Everywhere we look, we can only observe events
to occur at a particular order because a bowling ball must first be seen
rolling away from the bowler’s hands before striking the pins and not in any
other order or a pitcher must first throw a baseball before the hitter swings. Now,
before you say to me, “Thank you, Captain obvious” or roll your eyes and invoke
the “Well, duh!” moment, think for a minute about why the arrow of time goes
only in one direction - forward.
“The Arrow of Time, or Time's
Arrow, is a concept developed in 1927 by the British astronomer Arthur
Eddington involving the "one-way direction" or "asymmetry"
of time. It is an unsolved general
physics question”.
Part of the problem is that in
1927 and long before that and since, many laws of physics had been established
without necessarily specifying the arrow of time. Many formulas actually work whether time has
a positive or negative value. Let us not make any more detours and reserve that
for another time. There’s enough here to tickle the mind. Or compel
it to park on idle.
Now, back to “timing is
everything”:
The quickest way for water to
boil over a pot or for anything you are frying to burn is to step away for “just a
bit”. On the other hand, the shortest elapsed time sequence before the accident was what’s between the
moment you took your eyes off the road and the second you looked down to type an
unimportant text while driving.
The years contained in all the total
combined generations that had ever lived are a fraction of a blink of an eye in
the context of how long the universe had been in existence. From that
perspective, we ought to realize the overwhelming incentive to make the most of
every moment. Whether time is an illusion or an accessory of
our consciousness, it does not take but a moment to say how much we appreciate
somebody dear to us. Make it count each time because another moment will be
different from the one we missed.
No comments:
Post a Comment