It is fair to say, perhaps not even
debatable anymore, that today, as never before, we in the developed areas of
the world are confronted with just too much information, too much for our own
good, and simply too much for a well-ordered life in the future. Is information
over load an example of too much of a good thing? Are we being driven towards a
path of total dependence on information technology? Is information technology’s
advance infinitely self-sustaining, indomitably inextinguishable? If
information made life possible in the beginning, can too much of it stifle our
way of lives in the future, or will a sudden absence of it be both
existentially and sociologically paralyzing.
Those are not trivial questions to
ask. Imagine for a moment that tomorrow, without warning, every communication
satellite is disabled. It will be described no less than one massive global information
cardiac arrest. Is it highly unlikely, or never to happen?
Think about the following true
events:
a.)
One late afternoon on August 14, 2003, a
widespread power outage affected Northeastern and Midwestern U.S. and the
province of Ontario, Canada. Late that night some power was restored but it
took a whole week everywhere else, especially in rural areas, for restoration
to complete. “The blackout's primary cause was a software bug in the alarm
system at a control room of the First Energy Corporation, located in Ohio. A
lack of alarm left operators unaware of the need to re-distribute power after
overloaded transmission lines hit unpruned foliage, which triggered a race
condition in the control software. What would have been a manageable local
blackout cascaded into massive widespread distress on the electric grid”.
b.)
On Nov. 9, 1965 30 million people over an area
of 80,000 sq. miles in the Northeast and Ontario, Canada lost power completely
for 13 hours. Ontario is vulnerable,
again, because of its proximity to the Niagara generating stations. Human error was cause of the outage. “The safety relay, which was to trip if the
current exceeded the capacity of the transmission line, was set too low”.
c.)
On March 11, 1999 up to 90 million Brazilians
were treated to a total power blackout, “when a lightning strike occurred at
22h 16m at an electricity substation in Bauru, São Paulo State causing most of
the 440kV circuits at the substation to trip”.
All of the above occurred during
peace time. What would it be like in
times of a major military conflict? Let’s not go there because the mere thought
of it will give anyone even with the remotest hint of paranoia a most paralyzing
distress or unimaginable trepidation. Sometime in 1876, after the telegraph had
changed how information was propagated, the telephone was invented. Both changed in very dramatic fashion how
people communicated. It was the
beginning of the age of information technology.
But lest we forget, both of those inventions and everything else that
followed in its wake were dependent on one thing – electric energy. The new technology’s life blood and its Achilles heel
is electricity. Whether from land line or
stored from batteries, information technology’s umbilical cord can never be
detached from electrical power. And there lies the problem. And there is something
even more insidious – modern society is seduced into believing that information
technology has the solution to everything. But along with this is the evil misuse of the technology to stream live criminal acts of violence and widespread cyber bullying.
Theologians and non-believers
look at the first verse, Chapter I, of the Book of John in the New Testament
from two different views, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with
God, and the Word was God. The atheist makes a substitution, “In the beginning
was the information, and the information was with God, and the information was God”.
Here’s how I interpret the
biologist’s take on information. Life as
we know it begun with information. The only way for the first single cell
organism to survive was to capitalize on information. What linked the
primordial nucleus to the external cell membrane was information. The
rudimentary brain that was the nucleus depended on that information to make the
first synthesis that made life possible. It cascaded from there when everything
from the environment, the presence of nutrients, suitable locations, threats
and allies were crucial to survival that allowed for organisms to flourish,
diversify, evolve to complexity, etc.
Billions of years of evolution depended solely on the use of
information. Think about it. Plants,
which by the way are the first living organisms, must recognize the orientation
of their location towards sunlight, their roots must know where the water is,
nutrients from the soil must be identified, and all of these traits depend on,
you guessed it – information.
Before we get to the highly
sophisticated information at the human level, we must look back to where it all
started. Information was a key sustaining component to the origin of life and,
this is important to note, information evolved along with it.
Think about it. From the earliest microbes to worms to lizards and amphibians,
etc., every species had to rely on it to find food, shelter, and survive. Wolves
howl to establish their presence and communicate the extent of their territory.
Scent marking surpasses short- lived howls, growls, hisses and all kinds of
temporary vocalization. Scents preserved information over a period of time.
Fast forward to early human development and information took a dramatic leap
when growls and gestures were organized into repeatable vocalization that led
to language. Language led to written records. Written records led to another
dramatic leap towards the unprecedented explosion of knowledge.
So then man needed to extend the
reach of communication. Where tom-toms
and smoke signals begun, the written text made information not only readily
available for widespread use, it preserved the usefulness of it indefinitely. But word of mouth dissemination never
stopped. When gossip took days to spread
over a typical village, weeks to cover a typical town, the telephone shortened the
distance between people and communities to mere millimeters from the mouth and
ear pieces of a gadget invented in 1876.
Just as in any evolutionary
processes in biology where traits and even physical organs and extremities were
discarded in favor of newer ones that allowed for species to adapt and
flourish, technology in communication went through the same path of
elimination. Semaphore flags, ships’
signal lamps, the telegraph and fax machines, camera film rolls and a few
others are featured as museum pieces now after giving way to today’s ubiquitous
smart phones, tablets, laptops, digital cameras, etc. And these new ones we embrace
now so dearly hold them loosely, because they too will not be immune from “who-knows-what”
just waiting beyond the next breakthrough.
Alas, information came with the
good and the bad. Consider this. Joseph Goebbels was Reich Minister of
Propaganda in the Nazi Germany. Propaganda at that time did not have such a bad
connotation. The word’s etymology in fact comes from, “that which ought to be
spread”, as in propagate, not for carrying out misleading information, as we
know it today. Much earlier, Pope
Gregory XV founded the “Congregatio de Propaganda Fide” (“Congregation for
propagating the Faith”). In either case, the whole idea was to spread
information, good or bad.
Today, we have ministers of
information, press secretaries and spokesperson for one department or another,
for a cause or any entity that needs speaking for on its behalf. Today, the
media is barely above the Congress’ and politicians’ poll numbers. And it has come to this – the emergence of fake news! The web, the twitter world,
Facebook and everything associated with the propagation of information have
become instantaneous bulletin boards for everything, or from anyone and from
whoever has a story or agenda to propagate.
Urban legend, that foreshadowed the coming out of fake news, used to
take months, years, even a generation to spread. The run-of-the-mill gossip by
word of mouth, the echo of the tom-tom and the skyward sight of the smoke
signal were all the different contrails that information took. Today, by any name, these things spread with
the “speed
of summer lightning”.
It seems that there is so little
we can do to consume all these knowledge.
There is only so much the brain can take. A whirlpool of information hits us every day
and there will come a time when the overload starts numbing the brain into
mental apathy. Our brain is able to cope
because we’ve managed to outsource some of what it used to do. Our children are
being unburdened from mastering the multiplication table, calculating for the
square root of a number, and even the simple tasks of addition and subtraction are
sub-contracted to the $2 calculator. Mastering, let alone, understanding
differential and integral calculus will make no difference to sociology and
math majors.
If information evolved with our
biology, the reverse can happen when biology starts evolving with it. A hundred
generations from now, if we ever get there, science text books will explain how
texting made us grow out-sized thumbs to make lobsters jealous, how our nape
muscles will rival those of the musk ox from prolonged hunched postures over our
smart phones. Our peripheral visions will have shifted to scan up and down thus
vertically elongating the pupils like a civet cat’s.
Well, it may not come to that
because technology will not stand still long enough for evolution to dictate a
specific adaptation of particular body parts.
But some things can be predicted more accurately.
The pen and pencil industry will
suffer the most. Good penmanship will be
archived as masterpieces hanging in museums (where there is no need for foot
traffic because everything is either virtually viewed or downloaded). Intimate conversation could truly become a
lost art. The brain will
downsize as more and more of the mental tasks are relegated to the intelligence
of silicon wafers the size of a pinhead.
We will become physically frail as robots do much of the hard labor
while driver-less and self- braking cars will make even the most trifling
physical exertion of driving the car a thing of the past.
Here is where we are today. The train we’re on is hurtling at break
neck speed on the information railway.
It is not slowing down; it is speeding up, in fact, and getting off does
not look like a good option.
Unfortunately, the only thing that can stop a runaway train is
derailment – a most devastating scenario.
That scenario is the total failure of the energy infrastructure which,
by the way, relies heavily on information. Let us not forget that sources of
energy, be it oil, nuclear, hydro, wind power or solar, are all funneled into
producing electricity. That whole energy
to electricity complex, the whole caboodle, runs on information that runs on
electricity. It is a vicious cycle.
Somewhere in parts of the world
hostile to the western way of life are mal-intentioned folks who want nothing
more than to break or interrupt that cycle. That’s one. The threat of conflict between nations is
another. Not to be ignored are those not likely to be in anyone’s mind. Some
93 million miles away is one object in the sky which goes through a temper
tantrum every eleven years causing electro-magnetic disturbances that can
disrupt that cycle with impunity if past history is to e examined. From galaxies far, far
away, or even in the backyard of our own Milky Way, there are objects,
thousands or even a million times more massive than the sun, their farewell
gestures outshining an entire galaxy.
Those are not likely it either -
at least not during our lifetime. Has it
happened in the past? Yes. Our solar system came out of a massive
supernova explosion that also created all the heavy elements beyond and
including iron a few billion years ago.
This will call for another musing so let’s leave it at that but suffice
it to say, that’s a scenario too that could bring us back to the beginning, at
zero information.
Meanwhile, we need to re-examine
our place in the general scheme of things.
The New Testament verse I quoted earlier must be taken to heart. Regardless of your faith or personal beliefs,
our worries, our fears are all anthropocentric – translation: “the belief that considers human beings to be
the most significant entity of the universe and interprets or regards the world
in terms of human values and experiences”.
The weakest link in the
information technology turmoil is human frailty. While this technology was borne out of the
human spirit, its inventiveness and its resolve to make our lives “better”, it
is also the human character that is its weakness. We use and misuse almost everything we’ve
invented. Until such time that we have
perfected the human character, no amount of technology shall ever be safe from
misuse or will we ever be free from worrying about anything and everything.
No comments:
Post a Comment